|
Bush Administration: We're Working on the Legalities
by John Halliwell
Mon May 12, 2008 at 07:30:44 AM PDT
While the Bush Administration has,
from time to time, done things which are – ahem – ethically
questionable, it has usually made at least a half-hearted attempt to
cover them with a veneer of legality.
Occasionally, however, it will
throw aside any such pretensions. Take Sami Al-Arian, a man who should
never have been imprisoned in the first place, who has spent the last
five years in jail under conditions decried by Amnesty International as
"gratuitously punitive," whose prison term ended on April 11th, and who
is nevertheless still being held behind bars.
On what basis can he still be held in jail? Well...the government
hasn't quite sorted that one out yet. I called the Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) the other day (since April 11th, Dr. Al-Arian
has been under their jurisdiction), and asked them what the deal was.
"We have some procedures to take care of which might take up to 90
days." (Mind you, the ICE has known since December that Dr. Al-Arian
was scheduled to be deported in April) Right...because it takes 90 days
in addition to five full months of preparation to unlock a man's cell,
get him on a plane, and wave goodbye. In all fairness to the ICE,
though, they are probably preparing a surprise going-away party and
need that extensive period to find a date that suits all of Dr.
Al-Arian's closest friends – you know, John Ashcroft, Paul I.
Perez, and – last, but not least! – the Presidente himself.
(if you don't believe me, check this out)
So at this very moment, Dr.
Al-Arian is sitting in jail without a prison term, without a charge,
without any serious attempt at any sort of legal justification. Just
sitting there - no particular reason.
If you fear that the Bush
Administration is trying to undermine the rule of law, fear not! It is
working hard to come up with a new charge that will provide legal cover
for Dr. Al-Arian's continued incarceration: last month, a federal judge
in Virginia summoned Dr. Al-Arian to testify before a third grand jury;
Dr. Al-Arian refused to testify, and can accordingly be charged with
criminal contempt, a charge which carries a minimum sentence of five
years.
Never mind that Dr. Al-Arian's
plea agreement with the government from 2006 clearly exempts him from
having to testify; never mind that the government attorney who sought
his testimony essentially put a neon sign above the court room that
read "Perjury trap"; never mind that this same attorney revels not only
in his hatred of Muslims but also in his alleged right to use legal
loopholes to punish people he dislikes but can't find guilty in a court
of law. NEVER MIND. What's important is that, in a few days or less,
the government will have the legality it needs to lengthen Dr.
Al-Arian's sentence for at least five more years, possibly a decade,
possibly longer. (I discussed these irrelevant trivialities in a
previous post)
OK, granted that Dr. Al-Arian
never supported terrorism, that he never broke any laws, that he never
should have been in jail in the first place, or that he is being
punished solely for exercising his First Amendment rights. What's
important is that the Bush administration will soon have this covered
by a legality so that us law-abiding citizens can sleep soundly at
night knowing that we don't have to worry about the rule of law being
threatened in any way.
Sleep tight!
|